“I feel a fundamental crippling incuriousness about our officers. Too much body and too little head.”T.E. Lawrence, Letter to B. Liddell Hart, 1933
I recently heard a radio host talking about how he likes watching influencers on Instagram doing some of the basic things influencers do – talk about their day, open packages, discuss things they like. Simple, everyday things.
These are often the things that give influencers a bad rap.
The reality is, we’re fortunate that there are so many people out there who are willing to give us a peek behind the curtain. Our lives (especially our digital lives) are shrouded in secrecy.
What do you keep in your folders?
How messy is your desktop?
How many unread emails do you have?
John has always been very generous with his information, recently sharing the below:
Avatars Over the Years I’m taking time to clean out my digital folders this weekend and one folder that I’ve had for over 10+ years is this one:Avatars Over the Years | john saddington
That’s a lot to put out there -but isn’t it interesting?
Many of us spend time following people online because we find them fascinating. The more personal, the more interesting.
LtGen Lori Reynolds leads the Marine Corps’ modernization efforts related to operations in the information environment. During this episode, our wide ranging discussion covers competition, professional military education, authorities, technology, and partnerships.The Cognitive Crucible Episode #38 Reynolds on Operations in the Information Environment
LtGen Reynolds does a great job wrapping up the totality of the world we live in today, especially as it relates to media literacy and the fact that we’re all “in the game” when we have a smartphone in our pocket.
The nightmare quote:
“This whole idea of algorithmic warfare, it can be benign, or it can be malign, but it is happening right now. And it’s happening on your personal device.”
“If we think that our adversaries are not going to come after the United States military and impact our will to fight, we’re wrong.”
It’s refreshing to know we’re taking this seriously. The tough part is building the education, infrastructure, and systems to be ready before the “Pearl Harbor” of this style of warfare occurs.
It doesn’t have to be protests, armed conflict, or war. It can be the little things. And often, it is.
When Jim Scott mentions ‘resistance,’ this recovering political scientist isn’t usually talking about grand symbolic statements or large-scale synchronized actions by thousands or more battling an oppressive state. He’s often referring to daily actions by average people, often not acting in concert and perhaps not even seeing themselves as ‘resisting’ at all.Jim Scott on Resistance – Social Science Space
Related: 198 methods on nonviolent action.
I said everything I need to say about this in the below tweet.
In this episode, COL Eric Kreitz, the 1st SFC(A) Director of Information Warfare sits down with the 1st SFC Chaplain COL Chris Dickey. They discuss COL Kreitz’s very personal story – one of fear, addiction, and hitting rock bottom…but also one of resilience, support, and overcoming adversity.The Indigenous Approach – Caring for Our Most Important Resource
The audio is a little off, but it’s worth it.
A lot of Alice in Wonderland this week.
During this episode, Mr. Shomit Ghose of ONSET Ventures outlines the difference between marginal and disruptive innovation. We also talk about the embodiment of the Red Queen Hypothesis and the OODA loop in today’s competitive business climate where companies are expected to innovate quickly in order to stay ahead of their competition.The Cognitive Crucible Episode #36 Ghose on Disruptive Innovation, Amazoogle, and Entrepreneurship
A good, short episode from CC. Here’s the Red Queen Hypothesis from Ghose’s paper:
The Red Queen Hypothesis was put forward by University of Chicago biologist Leigh Van Valen in his seminal 1973 paper on “A New Evolutionary Law”. In this hypothesis, Van Valen posited that organisms must constantly adapt and evolve because they live in an ever-evolving ecosystem, competing for survival against other ever-evolving organisms. Everything is competitive, and nothing is constant; it’s explicitly a zero-sum game, and stasis means extinction. Just as in the Red Queen’s quote to Alice in Through the Looking-Glass.
In business, the Red Queen says that it’s not enough that your company is running as fast as possible, you need to run fast relative to your competition. With data-driven Amazoogle business models moving at breakneck speeds, how fast is your company running? If you’re not positioning yourself to out-Amazoogle your Amazoogle competition, then you’re positioned for irrelevance at best and extinction at worst.The Red Queen and the Inevitability of the Amazoogle Business Model
What is the competition, and what are they doing?
It’s not always going to be possible to beat the competition – they might be bigger, faster, more lethal – or maybe they play by a different set of rules.
If you can’t outcompete them with raw power, then you have to turn to innovation.
I appreciate this quote from the article.
“The railroads are in trouble today not because the need was filled by others (cars, trucks, airplanes, even telephones), but because it was not filled by the railroads themselves. They let others take customers away from them because they assumed themselves to be in the railroad business rather than in the transportation business. The reason they defined their industry wrong was because they were railroad-oriented instead of transportation-oriented; they were product oriented instead of customer-oriented.”Theodore Levitt, “Marketing Myopia”, Harvard Business Review, July-August 1960
A narrow focus on the thing you do versus the field you’re will eventually stifle you. Something – or someone – is going to figure it out. Unfortunately, many of us (myself included) tend to get focused on the important skills that got us to where we are. We’re good at them. They are tried and true – if I can just squeeze a little bit more out, I can get better.
That will work, to a point. Then it’s time to get disruptive.
A deep-dive on where we’ve been and where we are in regards to big-picture political warfare/public diplomacy.
I appreciate Matt’s insistence that it’s not about pulling the right “info-ops” lever or restructuring organizations, but having a clear strategic vision of where we’re going – a “commander’s intent.” With that, everyone can move in the right direction. We have the tools and we have the talent – we just need to know where to go.
If there is a strategy or something resembling a strategic vision, in other words, the president knows what we want tomorrow to look like and has a baseline understanding of the costs we are willing to pay and the costs we are willing to extract from adversaries (and allies), then there is a “page” for everyone to get on to (ie “commander’s intent”). Centralized orchestration breaks down quickly as the buck is passed and sign-offs are required. Along with a commonly understood goal (or goals), we need to tolerate risk so risk avoidance does not continue to have the priority. These are all products of leadership, or lack of leadership.Neglected History, Forgotten Lessons: a presentation and a discussion – MountainRunner.us
The post features an extended question and answer portion at the bottom. Worth reading if you are confused (and you are – I know I am) about the Smith-Mundt Act, the US Agency for Global Media (formerly BBG), and what the heck we’re even doing anymore.
Tell me this isn’t true.
“I’ve heard it said that if you do the things that made you successful as a Captain when you’re a Major, you’ll distinguish yourself as the best Captain in your unit.”Company-Grade to Field-Grade: Introducing “Making the Switch” | by CoCMD & PLT LDR | Leadership Counts! | Apr, 2021 | Medium
What are the things that junior officers should be doing as they get ready to make the switch to field grade officer?
I’m looking for answers to the following questions.
For current (or retired) field grade officers:
- What do you wish you knew before becoming a field-grade officer?
- What skills do you wish you developed before becoming a field-grade-officer?
For current junior officers:
- What do you want to know about becoming a field-grade officer?
- What perplexes you about making the switch?
- What rumors do you want confirmed/squashed?
- What do you expect from field-grade officers that is different from company-grade officers?
I love this topic and I think there is a lot we can learn here. I’m looking for help. Please contact me if you have insight or would like to contribute.
Fascinating interview on women, writing, and the Ba’athist state.
Hawraa Al Hassan’s Women, Writing and the Iraqi Ba’thist State: Contending Discourses of Resistance and Collaboration, 1968-2003 (University of Edinburgh Press, 2020) is unique because it both explores discourse concerning women and how women themselves used literature to create a site of resistance to the state. Al-Hassan’s work is also inclusive, as it joins a wider call to make literary studies a space in which works which were previously considered propagandistic can also be seriously considered.New Books Network | Hawraa Al Hassan, “Women, Writing and the Iraqi…
There are some great gems in this episode and areas I would like to dig deeper on, such as:
-Saddam eradicating illiteracy chiefly to build a wider audience for Ba’athist propaganda.
-Book covers as messages (not many read the book, but they do see the cover).
-The novels of Saddam Hussein. You may recall, it is believed that Sacha Baron Cohen’s comedy The Dictator was inspired by one of these novels.